The term wiki comes from the Hawaiian word meaning fast. In internet culture, the term is associated with the technology that creates collaboration sites, the most known as Wikipedia.
The writer of Wiki, Ward Cunningham, says he wanted people who would not normally publish their writing to find it convenient to do that. People who have something to say often can not find the context to express it in writing. By allowing users to initiate and modify any page on a site is liberating, in the sense that it encourages the equal, democratic use of the web and promotes content creation of common people.
Starting from the idea that knowledge would be accessible to all, Wikipedia found an opportunity and joined it - soon becoming one of the most widely used sites and most used reference sources. It is now clear that web articles that you have to pay to read are missing value - even if you are willing to pay to read them yourself, you can not link to them - they can not be shared so they do not make it to the spotlight they do not go virala, they can not be discussed.
Some of the benefits of the wiki are that even if nature is open, not everyone has the same access and some rules are applied all the time. In order to use the wiki, no additional software is required, there is also no need for specialized courses to learn how to handle a wiki. It is also good to know that technical problems are minimal.
Wikipedia was launched in 2001, as an alternative to the traditional encyclopedia. First of all, Wikipedia is free to anyone and it can be edited by someone. Anonymous users can add, delete or change content according to their own knowledge. The costs are minimal - unlike paper bikes - and information can be updated immediately. You can start a page and write everything you want in it. Someone else can come along and make absolutely some changes in what he wants. On the newly created page you can link to other pages, and of course they can link back.
Being open to such a large number of readers and authors is not easy to keep all information completely accurate. You can see who contributed to a particular article; You can discuss the process of writing the article. The point of view may sometimes be subjective; the article can sometimes only share the information. Since errors can still occur, Wikipedia is rarely accepted as an academic source. Sometimes students can not tell which article is reliable and that is not, and they quote Wikipedia as it is completely correct. However, it covers an enormous field, from history to pop culture, from researchers to starlets and so forth. There are pages in almost any language. The articles are linked to each other, cross-reference, and keep the reader a click away from even more information.
The development of Wikipedia was spectacular. At the end of the year when it was launched, it had about 20,000 items. In 2007, it had more than 2 million articles and became the largest encyclopedia ever. In 2004, it was already available for mobile phone use, which also extends beyond its original reason.
When it comes to other uses for wiki people are often confused; mainly because they do not realize how easy it is for this structure to be used. On a smaller scale, the wiki is a version of the Internet, with things that at first glance are placed randomly. But a wiki on a particular project has every reason to be well-organized. While a number of people add a page, they can also use the discussion section on one page to comment and discuss ongoing work. The leader or an authorized person can see in the History section to view each individual version of the page as edited by users. Can teachers benefit from this tool?
Wikien is easy to use, open to integration of multimedia content. The teacher can evaluate both the quality and quantity of the students work. The wiki platform provides the audience with a learning process (teachers and other students) and a collaborative work space where students can create and share content. In the field of education, wikis can be used as personal portfolios or for coordination of research. They make it easier to follow a group project. they allow a common query system for the students; They make a good debate and discussion environment.